Something your lab or your doctor actually said
Taken from a document in your record and left as it was written. You can always open the report it came from — nothing wears this label unless that original is there to open.
A health record that admits what it doesn't know.
Every lab, vital, condition and visit — from every doctor you've seen — gathered into one place. Then nothing is said without saying where it came from: your doctor, the research, a calculation, an AI reading your notes, or you. The label sits with the words it belongs to, not in the small print.
Open your record
single-patient · self-hosted · yours alone
Six kinds of knowing, and the label you'll see on each.
These are the real labels, exactly as they appear in your record. They're told apart by what they say rather than by colour, so they still read if you can't tell the hues apart — and so none of them can look more official than the others.
Something the published research says
The number in the label is the paper: you can look it up yourself. If a claim can't produce a real citation, vivos files it as a model inference instead — research it half-remembers gets no more credit than a guess.
A number vivos worked out
Ask again tomorrow and the same readings give the same answer. The label names the calculation, and you can see which of your own measurements went into it.
Something a model concluded by reading
This is where AI shows up, and it always announces itself — dashed edge, plain words. It is never dressed up as something your doctor said, and it never replaces the note it read: both stay side by side.
Something you told it yourself
Your own account of your own body, kept as evidence rather than as a footnote. This is the only label in the accent colour, because it's the one that came from you.
A conclusion drawn from more than one thing
It comes apart in front of you, each piece keeping its own label. If it can't be broken down, you don't see it at all — there is no tidy single sentence that hides where it came from.
A label is only worth as much as the rule behind it.
Every one of these is something you can check by using vivos. They hold because the record is built so they can't be skipped — not because someone remembered.
Nothing reaches you without a label
There's no side door. It isn't a habit someone could forget on a busy day — the record physically refuses to hold a statement that doesn't say where it came from. If you ever see one that doesn't, that's a bug worth reporting.
Corrections are added, never painted over
When vivos changes its mind, the older version stays readable underneath. You can see what it used to think and when that changed, instead of finding history quietly rewritten.
It tells you what moved together, not what caused what
You'll be shown that two things happened around the same time. You won't be told one caused the other — that conversation belongs to you and your clinician, and the wording is checked so it can't drift into sounding like a diagnosis.
There are three different kinds of nothing
Not recorded isn't the same as a measured zero, and neither is an empty section. Each one looks different on screen, so a blank space is never left to suggest you're fine.
It would rather say nothing than guess
Some judgements need a citation and a person's sign-off before vivos will make them, and until it has both it stays quiet on that point. You'll see less this way — and what you do see is worth more.
A missing record is treated as work, not as a blank
A doctor whose notes never arrived doesn't quietly vanish from your history. They become something to chase, with a priority against them, and the gap says plainly that it's a gap.
Built for the fifteen minutes, not the download.
A condition that touches every system makes "everything relevant" the wrong filter for any one specialist. Hand a cardiologist the whole record and the cardiac signal becomes the hardest thing in it to find.
[source record]
It already knows which doctor you're seeing
vivos keeps every clinician you've seen, their specialty, and what they actually treat you for — including the ones whose records never arrived, where the gap shows as — instead of as nothing at all.
That's enough to narrow a visit to the specialist in front of you: the trends that bear on their field, and the worries that belong to a different appointment.
CardiologyAllergy / ImmunologyGastroenterologyNeurologyPrimary care
[model inference]
The visit brief is still being designed
The intended shape: one page per appointment — what to bring, what to raise first, and what to leave for another visit, drawn from your own record.
It is not built, so it is not in the app, and this page will not imply otherwise. When it ships it will carry the tag above on every line it wrote: something to open the conversation with, never a conclusion about your health.